The U.S. Supreme Court website recently posted the text of a Ruth Bader Ginsburg speech at the Constitutional Court of South Africa, February 7, 2006, entitled
"A decent Respect to the Opinions of [Human]kind": The Value of a Comparative Perspective in Constitutional Adjudication. Justice Ginsburg's speech begins "In the United States the question whether and when courts may seek enlightenment from the laws and decisions of other nations has provoked heated debate...the view I have long held [is]If U.S. experience and decisions can be instructive to systems that have more recently instituted or invigorated judicial review for constitutionality, so we can learn from others ... now engaged in measuring ordinary laws and executive actions against charters securing basic rights."
She recognized the opposite position, quoting Justice Scalia: "To invoke alien law when it agrees with one's own thinking, and ignore it otherwise, is not reasoned decisionmaking, but sophistry.'" She also mentions Richard Posner's criticisms. See
No Thanks, We Already Have Our Own Laws: The Court Should Never View a Foreign Legal Decision as a Precedent in Any Way, Legal Aff., July-Aug. 2004.
One perspective on this interesting controversy is on its way to the United States Supreme Court in the case of Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, 415 F.3d 33 (D.C.Cir. 2005),
Cert. Granted 126 S.Ct. 622 (U.S. Nov 07, 2005) (NO. 05-184). Hamdan was detained in Afghanistan, and the case involves the legality of military tribunals, the inherent power of the President, and whether American courts can judicially enforce individual rights protected under Article III of the 1949 Geneval Convention in an action for a writ of habeas corpus challenging the legality of detention by the Executive branch? The Circuit court reversed a District Ct. opinion which accepted Hamdan’s argument that the federal court could in fact enforce the
Geneva Convention Relative to theTreatment of Prisoners of War, Aug. 12, 1949, 6 U.S.T. 3316(“1949 Geneva Convention”).
To date, over 50 Amicus briefs have been filed in the Hamdan case. Students may, of course, access a helpful list on Westlaw or Lexis, and anyone doing research in this area ought to also review the postings and analysis at the ScotUS blog,
http://www.scotusblog.com/